+
17.
COM
1.
-
C.
304
For this audit
who makes an annual tour to Tei-Hai-Wei.
the Auditor receives a salary of £86. 5., which we most humbly submit should more correctly be considered as a reimbursement to the Colony of Hong Kong for the services
of the officer detached for this work. This salary the Auditor, Hugh Richard Phelips, would be prepared to waive
any right to if his emoluments were raised to the
equivalent of other heads of 2nd class departments, that is a maximum of £1,200 per annum as proposed by the
Director of Colonial Audit. In connection with this
matter we humbly draw your attention to the fact that
in past years Engineers of the Public Works Department
have been lent to the Wei-Hai-Wei Government on similar
conditions, a cadet officer has recently been lent for
service under the New Zealand Government and in 1905 a
cadet officer was lent as the Transvaal Emigration Agent
at Ching Wang Tao.
14. Further we humbly bring to your notice the fact that
the Auditor, or one of his staif, has to visit the various
British Postal Agencies in China, for which work neither
the Auditor or the Government of Hong Kong receives any
remuneration; and the officer who undertakes these visits
is often considerably out of pocket as the subsistence
allowance is insuficient to meet the necessary expenses
which have so greatly increased in recent years.
15. We humbly bring to your notice the inadequacy of the
salaries provided for the two Assistant Auditors.
We beg to point out that the Assistant Auditors are
no longer young men like the majority of their colleagues
serving in other Colonies and Protectorates. They are
ņ
EN CATAN đi motak:
16.
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.